<record>
  <header>
    <identifier>oai:eurokd.com:article/108</identifier>
    <datestamp>2025-12-15</datestamp>
  </header>
  <metadata>
    <oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
      <dc:title>The Influence of Earnings Quality for Restatements and Auditor’s Qualified Opinion</dc:title>
      <dc:description>&lt;p style="text-align:justify;"&gt;The&amp;nbsp;objective of the present study was to raise the cases of restatements and to&amp;nbsp;evaluate whether these events were associated with the low earnings quality and&amp;nbsp;with the provision of advice with a qualified opinion by audit firms. The&amp;nbsp;results obtained with the analysis indicate that the low earnings quality&amp;nbsp;increases the chances of republishing the financial statements. Additionally,&amp;nbsp;the results indicate that there is no evidence that lower earnings quality&amp;nbsp;increases the chances of issuing a qualified audit report or disapproval of the&amp;nbsp;financial statements by the independent auditors. These results point to a&amp;nbsp;divergence regarding the understanding of earnings quality by the auditors and by the regulatory agency.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
      <dc:publisher>EuroKD Publishing</dc:publisher>
      <dc:date>2020-07-12</dc:date>
      <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>https://api.eurokd.com/Uploads/Article/108/NCAF.2020.03.05.pdf</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.32038/NCAF.2020.03.05</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>en</dc:language>
      <dc:coverage>Pages 53–68</dc:coverage>
    </oai_dc:dc>
  </metadata>
</record>